A creative approach when 1D hydraulic modeling is the only option
What is your recourse when an agency or client won’t accept a 2D hydraulic model of a complex floodplain project? This is exactly the dilemma that we recently faced when trying to address an important engineering issue using outdated technology.
In “2D or not 2D? A new era in hydraulic modeling”, I discussed the rapid developments underway in 2D hydraulic modeling, and how it’s more accessible and easier thanks to the addition of 2D modeling in HEC-RAS. But what if you are limited to only a 1D model, even though the situation being modeled is best suited for 2D?
The floodplain project being modeled is a prime example of an area that should be modeled in 2D. It has complex flow patterns and flow exchanges between streams on a very broad, flat floodplain. Rather than modeling the area easily with 2D, we are attempting to model it using 1D because the agencies involved will not accept a 2D model.
This is not uncommon. Many agencies find it difficult to adapt their guidelines to incorporate 2D modeling. The guidelines are often decades old and were developed around the principles of 1D modeling. Until the guidelines are adapted to incorporate 2D hydraulic modeling methods, consultants must adapt our 1D modeling techniques to model the situation at hand.
In the case of this client’s project, my colleagues and I are finding creative ways to incorporate the 2D flow patterns into a 1D hydraulic model. The 1D model is very complex, and to no one’s surprise, has difficulties. However, by dialing back the complexity of the model without jeopardizing the hydraulics, we are hopeful that that we can develop a 1D model that will function as intended.
As a 2D model isn’t acceptable for some agencies, we are also investigating development of a 2D model that will help inform development of the 1D model.
The lesson here is that even though a 2D model may be the ideal solution for certain modeling projects, a workable, usable 1D model can still be developed if needed. It just takes a little extra work, expertise and creativity to adapt the modeling to fit the situation at hand.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Nick Hathaway has always had a fascination with the movement and power of water. As a kid he would often spend summers at a local stream creating miniature dams and finding ways to manipulate the flow of the water. As a water resources engineer at Mead & Hunt, Nick now gets to work with water on a much larger scale. His main focus is on hydrologic and hydraulic analyses for projects related to dam safety, hydropower, levees, floodplain mapping, drainage studies and bridge design.
Other blog articles by Nick include:
Filter by Expertise
FERC releases new water conveyance guidelines, keyword is ‘proactive’
September 12, 2018
Leadership best practices shared by military engineers
August 29, 2018
Using drones on Corps of Engineer projects
July 31, 2018
FERC Form 80 Recreation Report modernized
July 17, 2018
07:54 PM Sep 20th
#Oroville taught us that #damsafety must include #appurtenant structures including #waterconveyance. Proactive… https://t.co/WeTlfYWHau
07:52 PM Sep 20th
The only way to achieve success with a project this intricate is to work hand-in-hand with the client. It was impor… https://t.co/uoACJ7votu